Sammanfattning

This thesis examines how the EU Artificial Intelligence Act and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)regulate the use of AI in credit assess- ment, with a focus on protecting fundamental rights such as transpar- ency and non-discrimination. Using a doctrinal legal method, the analysis ex- plores key legal obligations under both frameworks, including Article 22 GDPR, the classification of high-risk systems under the AI Act, and the role of Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) and Fundamental Rights Im- pact Assessments (FRIAs). The findings show that while both legal instruments aim to safeguard individ- uals from harm, gaps in clarity, enforceability, and oversight standards limit their effectiveness. In particular, the thesis identifies challenges in defining automated decision-making, ensuring meaningful human oversight, and op- erationalising FRIA obligations in practice. By comparing regulatory mechanisms and highlighting a practical example, the thesis concludes that the current EU framework forms a strong foundation but requires further clarification, enforcement coordination, and institutional support to ensure that AI-driven credit decisions are not only compliant, but also fair and just.

Utforska vidare

Liknande uppsatser

Uppsatser med liknande ämnen och nyckelord.