Artilleriets roll i alliansen : En kvalitativ doktrinjämförelse av indirekt eld i Försvarsmakten och Nato

Sammanfattning

Following the Swedish accession into the NATO alliance, matters of interoperability and cooperation within the alliance have become urgent research topics for the Swedish Armed Forces. Some changes have already been made to the structure of the Swedish Armed Forces, but there are yet areas where the authoritative documents of military utilization are not aligned, which risk causing friction between member nations during future warfighting. This paper analyzes the differences between NATO and Sweden in terms of artillery doctrine, and aims to further the understanding of this field especially within the Swedish officer corps. This is done in order to ease future cooperation and in extension increase the military power of the alliance and therefore its deterrence of war. The study is conducted through document analysis of Swedish and NATO doctrines, using Swedish military principles as a theoretical framework. The study finds that there are some differences in the artillery usage between the organizations, mostly based on the strong emphasis on mission command in Sweden compared to the more strict and ordered hierarchy in NATO. However the study also finds that many areas are very similar and that the potential for interoperability is good. To build upon this study, a comparison of more countries with NATO could be done, such as Finland or Ukraine. One could also utilize a different theoretical model for the analysis to achieve a different perspective.